Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD FirePro W8100

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD FirePro W8100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 220W)
AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
FirePro W8100 +55%
4.219 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Jun 2014
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
220W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy