Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1785MHz vs 1762MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400 +48%
2.706 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1630
1.828 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A400
2091
GeForce GTX 1630
2100

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Jun 2022
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
1740 MHz
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
8
768
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net