Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400 +552%
2.706 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
192
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
28
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.8
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy