NVIDIA RTX A400 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Boost Clock1762MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+475%
15.56 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
256
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
22 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
