NVIDIA RTX A400 vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Boost Clock1762MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+808%
24.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
8192
24
TMUs
512
16
ROPs
512
24
Tensor Cores
128
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
450W
250 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
22 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
