Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA NVS 510

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA NVS 510

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400 +784%
2.706 TFLOPS
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Oct 2012
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
192
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy