Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 89% (1762MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400 +184%
2.706 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Dec 2013
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy