Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (2130MHz vs 1762MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +343%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Feb 2024
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
22
768
Shading Units
2816
24
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
24
Tensor Cores
88
6
RT Cores
22
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy