Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A4000 Max Q and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4000 Max Q +3618%
14.28 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2009
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

780 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
352.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
320
160
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
8
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

111.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
223.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
14.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
223.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy