NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A4000 Max Q and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1395MHz vs 1266MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4000 Max Q
+144%
14.28 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM
5.834 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Sep 2016
Ampere-MW
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
780 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
352.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
2304
160
TMUs
144
80
ROPs
32
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
223.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
14.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
14.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
223.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
