Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A4000 Mobile and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (115W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4000 Mobile +3622%
17.2 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
40
SM Count
24
5120
Shading Units
192
160
TMUs
64
80
ROPs
24
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

134.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
17.20 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

115W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy