Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4000H vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX A4000H vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4000H 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
5904 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4000H +2607%
19.17 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Ampere
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
30
6144
Shading Units
240
192
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

140W
TDP
204W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GT200B
GA104-???-A1
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy