NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 384.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded
+3%
14.31 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
46
SM Count
-
5888
Shading Units
7680
184
TMUs
240
96
ROPs
120
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
8 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
