NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
5816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded
+8733%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2009
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
550 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
46
SM Count
9
5888
Shading Units
72
184
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
8
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.488 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.46 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
162.0 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
80W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM4
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
