Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Tesla M1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
5648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 188W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded +2200%
14.31 TFLOPS
Tesla M1060
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
30
5888
Shading Units
240
184
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
32
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
188W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy