CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla S1070
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla S1070
VS
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
NVIDIA Tesla S1070
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
5648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Max Q
+2200%
14.31 TFLOPS
Tesla S1070
0.622 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Max Q
VS
Tesla S1070
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
46
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
5888
Shading Units
240
184
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
32
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
80W
TDP
800W
-
Suggested PSU
1200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
2
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
3
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
4
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
5
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
6
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
7
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
8
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
9
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100
10
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy