Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
5312 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 140W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Mobile +2245%
17.66 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

46
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
5888
Shading Units
576
184
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
276.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
17.66 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
276.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

140W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy