Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (640.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
6976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 +5504%
23.65 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1050 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
640.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
4
7168
Shading Units
192
224
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

158.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
369.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
23.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
369.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy