Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (640.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
7056 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 +8346%
23.65 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1050 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
640.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
14
7168
Shading Units
112
224
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

158.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
369.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
23.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
369.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
78W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy