Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1700MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 20GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 640.0GB/s)
6912 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500
23.65 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +102%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1050 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
320bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
640.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
56
SM Count
-
7168
Shading Units
14080
224
TMUs
880
96
ROPs
0
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

158.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
369.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
23.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
369.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Ampere
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy