Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (640.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 +2200%
23.65 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1050 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
384bit
640.0GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
14
7168
Shading Units
448
224
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

158.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
369.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
23.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
369.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
238W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy