Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (640.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 +2081%
23.65 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1050 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
640.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
7168
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

158.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
369.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
23.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
369.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy