Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1936 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 78W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded +1852%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
14
2048
Shading Units
112
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
78W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy