Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 21W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded +18755%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
2
2048
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
21W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
G86
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy