NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 160W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1545MHz vs 1335MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000
+30%
7.119 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A500 Embedded
2628
Quadro RTX 4000
+198%
7853
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
1005 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
36
2048
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
64
Tensor Cores
288
16
RT Cores
36
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
160W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
