Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1260MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q +35%
18.71 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

585 MHz
Base Clock
-
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
58
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
7680
232
TMUs
240
96
ROPs
120
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
22 billion
Transistors
8 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy