NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
We compared a Professional market GPU: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and a Desktop platform GPU: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1260MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
7408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q
+53357%
18.71 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Oct 2009
Ampere-MW
Generation
GeForce 200
Professional
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
585 MHz
Base Clock
-
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
58
SM Count
2
7424
Shading Units
16
232
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
80W
TDP
31W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA103
GPU Name
GT216
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
