Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1260MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
7232 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q +3949%
18.71 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

585 MHz
Base Clock
-
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
58
SM Count
24
7424
Shading Units
192
232
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
16
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
22 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy