NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 416.0GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 160W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (1545MHz vs 1260MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q
+162%
18.71 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000
7.119 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2018
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
585 MHz
Base Clock
1005 MHz
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
58
SM Count
36
7424
Shading Units
2304
232
TMUs
144
96
ROPs
64
232
Tensor Cores
288
58
RT Cores
36
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
160W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA103
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
22 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
