Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1620MHz vs 1260MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Max Q +463%
18.71 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
May 2019
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

585 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1260 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
58
SM Count
16
7424
Shading Units
1024
232
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

121.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
292.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
18.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
18.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
292.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
22 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net