Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Mobile +2507%
22.27 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
58
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
640
232
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
348.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
22.27 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.27 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
348.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy