Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
7416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 Mobile +96726%
22.27 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
58
SM Count
1
7424
Shading Units
8
232
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
348.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
22.27 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.27 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
348.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

165W
TDP
12W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA103
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy