Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 768.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 +131%
34.1 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
10240
Shading Units
8192
320
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
128
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy