Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
10000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 +7793%
34.1 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
5
-
Compute Units
-
10240
Shading Units
240
320
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
32
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Board Design

230W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy