Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
10192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 +26750%
34.1 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
6
10240
Shading Units
48
320
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
16
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy