Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
10048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 +12483%
34.1 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
10240
Shading Units
192
320
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
38W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy