Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
10048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 +7280%
34.1 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
24
10240
Shading Units
192
320
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
24
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy