Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
10192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A5500 +29296%
34.1 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
6
10240
Shading Units
48
320
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy