CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
VS
NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX TITAN Ada and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
18192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX TITAN Ada
+13021%
92.9 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
RTX TITAN Ada
VS
GeForce GTX 285
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2008
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
1152GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
144
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
18432
Shading Units
240
576
TMUs
80
192
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GT200B
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
800W
TDP
204W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX
2
NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
3
NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada vs ATI FirePro V3800
4
NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
5
NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada vs ATI FirePro V7900
6
NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
7
NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050
8
NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
9
NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB GP104
10
NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy