Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD FirePro W4100

NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400 4 GB +69%
1.094 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy