Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD FirePro W8000

NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +194%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
384
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy