Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +423%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Apr 2017
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy