Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 54% (2200MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V620 +1753%
20.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
1825 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
72
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
4608
24
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
633.6 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
40.55 TFLOPS
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.28 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1267 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Navi 21
-
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy