Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

NVIDIA T400 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400 +1267%
1.094 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
May 2010
Quadro
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
80
24
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
M93
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy