Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA T400 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +630%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Mar 2016
Quadro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy