Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 vs ATI FirePro V3900

NVIDIA T400 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
96 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400 +75%
1.094 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Feb 2012
Quadro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
480
24
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy