Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1665MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 +172%
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Apr 2019
Quadro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy