Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

NVIDIA T400 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1425MHz vs 930MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400 +14%
1.094 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Dec 2013
Quadro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy