NVIDIA T600 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro M6000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 Max Q and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 43W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T600 Max Q
+144%
2.5 TFLOPS
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2012
Quadro Turing-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
640
56
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
44.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
5.000 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.500 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
78.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
43W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Heathrow
-
GPU Variant
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
