NVIDIA T600 Max-Q vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 Max Q and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 Max-Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (2010MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T600 Max Q
2.5 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+394%
12.35 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Turing-M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
24
896
Shading Units
3072
56
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
44.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
5.000 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
2.500 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
78.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
